Supplier Rescue Warpage Correction
T1 samples had warpage and assembly gaps that the original supplier could not explain clearly.
Buyer situation
Warped T1 samples, assembly-gap photos, existing CAD, trial information and unclear supplier explanations.
Main risk
T1 samples had warpage and assembly gaps that the original supplier could not explain clearly.
Engineering decision
Part geometry, gate assumption and cooling-risk review separated correctable tooling issues from design limitations.
Sample gate
Re-trial review focused on flatness, assembly gap, shrinkage behavior, injection conditions and whether the correction path was commercially realistic.
Evidence
Part geometry, gate assumptions and cooling risk were reviewed before correction.
Buyer takeaway
Mold rescue starts with evidence discipline; without trial parameters and sample records, every correction guess becomes expensive.
Evidence matrix
| Evidence area | What the buyer should see |
|---|---|
| Starting files | CAD, drawing, sample photos or supplier issue notes that explain why the project needed review. |
| Mold decision | Steel, cavity, gate, parting-line, slider, insert or export handoff assumptions. |
| Sample gate | T1 sample photos, dimensions, appearance notes, assembly fit and issue list. |
| Release proof | Dimensional or FAI record, material confirmation, correction log and acceptance status. |