Why this matters
Understand how parting line, gate placement, cooling layout and cavity count get decided during mold design, and why changing them later is far more expensive than reviewing them before steel is cut. Mold design is where parting line, gate location, cooling layout and cavity count get fixed, and every one of those choices is far cheaper to change on a drawing than after steel has been cut.
Buyer checks
Quote variables
| Quote variable | Why it changes the mold route |
|---|---|
| Parting line placement | A parting line across a cosmetic face creates a visible seam; moving it earlier in design is far cheaper than accepting the cosmetic risk later. |
| Gate location and type | Gate position drives weld-line location, fill balance and gate-vestige visibility, all of which affect T1 acceptance. |
| Cooling layout | Uneven cooling around thick sections or ribs is a common source of warpage that shows up only after T1 samples are molded. |
| Cavity count | Cavity count should match the order and near-term volume; oversizing it adds cost and balance risk without a clear payback. |
Common mistakes
How to apply it
Ask to see parting line, gate location and cooling layout marked on the part geometry before mold design is approved, not just a general description of the tool. If the project is early, the guide can show whether the next move is CAD cleanup, DFM review, prototype tooling, production mold planning, export mold handoff or repair review.